K-pop band member sued for $30m after bitter record label feud

Chart-topping K-pop band NewJeans’ record label, Ador, is suing one of the band’s members in what is yet another twist in their bitter year-long feud.

‎Hybe, the record label’s parent company, confirmed to the BBC that it is suing Danielle Marsh, one of her family members, and ex-boss Min Hee-jin for $30m (£22m) in damages and as part of a contract break penalty.

‎The band has been plunged into further turmoil as the return of Minji, another of its stars, remains uncertain, leaving the band with three members.

‎Coming less than two months after reports that NewJeans would return to the label as a band of five, this news dashes fans’ hopes of a comeback.

‎Many took to social media with the slogan: “NewJeans is five or nothing, while others questioned why Danielle was singled out.

‎Does this make any sense??? NewJeans without Danielle isn’t NewJeans. Do you think you can just erase a member this easily? Give us back Danielle,” one wrote in an X post.

‎”It’s not fair at all. Free NewJeans [all 5 members],” another wrote on Instagram. “All they wanted to do was to be [artists] and make their fans happy.”

‎NewJeans, which became the eighth biggest-selling act in the world a year after their debut in 2022, were seen as a game-changer by critics for their blend of 1990s R&B and sugar-coated pop melodies.

‎Then came a dramatic fallout with Ador in 2024, sparked by the controversial dismissal of the agency’s former CEO Min Hee-jin, whom NewJeans regarded as a mentor.

‎The move shook the K-pop world, setting off a battle between hugely successful and very young stars – they are between 17 and 21 years of age – and the South Korean entertainment giant, Hybe.

‎NewJeans accused Ador of “mistreatment” and “deliberate miscommunications and manipulation”, then announced they would leave the agency. Ador in turn launched a lawsuit blocking their departure, which it won in October this year. A district court ruled that NewJeans must honour their contract with the label which runs until 2029.

‎A month later, local media reports indicated that all five members would return to the agency.

‎Then in a surprising turn, Ador issued a statement on Monday, saying it had terminated its contract with Danielle and would take legal action against a family member of hers and Min, who founded the label and created NewJeans before her dramatic departure.

‎Both of them, Ador claims, “bear significant responsibility” for the fallout between the agency and the K-pop group.

‎Monday’s statement did not mention a lawsuit against Danielle, saying only that Ador had decided it was difficult to continue working with her, and told her they would be ending the contract

‎Ador also claimed that NewJeans’ members had been “exposed to persistently distorted and biased information” which led to “significant misunderstandings” about the label.

‎That statement named two other NewJeans members: Hanni, who it said decided to remain with the label after “extended conversations” which included her family, and Minji, who is still in “ongoing conversations” with the agency.

‎It’s been a whirlwind for fans, especially since Ador initially announced in November that only two members, Hyein and Haerin, would return to the agency, sparking fears the group would split up.

‎These fears were allayed when Hanni, Danielle and Minji said in a separate statement hours later that they too would return – but only for a short time, as it turns out.

‎NewJeans is a very important group that changed the world of female K-pop acts. For the music listeners and fans, it has been the hope to see their return as a full five-member team. That’s no longer possible,” music critic Lim Hee-yun told the BBC, adding that this outcome would not “make anyone happy”.

‎Mr Lim believes Ador would be pressured to recruit new members into the group, especially if Minji also leaves the label.

‎It is hard for three-member groups to find success in the K-pop industry, where fans pay close attention to the relationships and chemistry between members.

‎Danielle’s future as a musician is also uncertain.

‎”Not only will there be a large part of the public that see her negatively [because of this controversy], but the record labels will too… She might need to pursue being a solo act as an actor, model, or an influencer,” Mr Lim said.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*