Cillian Murphy’s return as Tommy Shelby feels less like a sequel and more like a reckoning. After years of silence following the final season of Peaky Blinders, the announcement of The Immortal Man lands with the weight of unfinished business. Tommy has never been a character who simply fades away, and Murphy’s reappearance signals that this story still has something urgent to say, both about its central antihero and the world that shaped him.
What made Peaky Blinders endure wasn’t just razor blades in caps or slow-motion swagger. It was the way the series tracked the psychological cost of power. Tommy Shelby was never glorified without consequence; every victory tightened the noose around his soul. Murphy played him as a man constantly negotiating with ghosts—war, family, guilt, ambition—and that internal war became the show’s true engine. A return now suggests that those ghosts never really left.
The Immortal Man arrives in a very different cultural moment than the early seasons did. The appetite for morally complex protagonists has deepened, but so has the scrutiny. Tommy Shelby is no longer just a stylish outlaw; he’s a case study in trauma, capitalism, and control. Revisiting him now opens space to examine what survival actually costs when the world keeps demanding more brutality as the price of relevance.
Murphy’s performance has always thrived on restraint. A twitch of the jaw, a stare held a second too long, a quiet line delivered like a threat or a confession—it’s acting that trusts the audience. That trust is rare, and it’s one reason Tommy never felt cartoonish despite the heightened world around him. If The Immortal Man works, it will be because Murphy again resists nostalgia and plays Tommy as a man changed by time rather than preserved by it.
There’s also something fitting about this chapter living on Netflix, a platform built on reinvention and return. Peaky Blinders itself grew larger after its initial run because viewers discovered it late, binged it hard, and carried it forward through word of mouth. This continuation feels less like a revival engineered by demand and more like a continuation shaped by legacy—an attempt to close a chapter properly rather than simply reopen it.
The title alone hints at irony. Tommy Shelby has always been treated like a myth inside his own world, a man rumored to be unkillable. But immortality, in Peaky Blinders, was never about living forever—it was about being unable to escape yourself. If the story leans into that idea, the film has the chance to interrogate whether endurance is strength or punishment.
What’s most intriguing is the question of scale. The series grew from street-level scheming to global power plays, sometimes at the cost of intimacy. A focused return could reverse that trend, stripping things back to character rather than spectacle. Tommy at his best is not surrounded by armies or institutions, but alone with a decision that will damn him either way.
There’s also the matter of age. Time changes the way violence lands, the way ambition feels in the body. An older Tommy Shelby isn’t just a continuation; he’s a commentary. Watching Murphy inhabit that evolution could add a layer of melancholy and honesty that the earlier seasons only hinted at, especially if the story allows space for regret rather than constant escalation.
Fans will inevitably come with expectations—certain lines, certain looks, certain music cues. The risk of fan service is real. But Peaky Blinders was never at its strongest when it tried to please. It was strongest when it unsettled, when it reminded viewers that power corrodes and survival isn’t the same as victory. That tension is what made Tommy compelling in the first place.
In the end, The Immortal Man doesn’t need to resurrect Peaky Blinders. It needs to confront it. If Cillian Murphy’s return does anything, it should be to look directly at the myth of Tommy Shelby and ask what’s left when the legend can no longer protect the man. That kind of reckoning would feel earned—and very much alive.
Leave a Reply